Study of Transfection Efficiencies of Cationic Glyconanoparticles of Different Sizes in Human Cell Line
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The growing attention toward the synthesis and uses of gold nanoparticles for biomedical applications is based on their biocompatibility, ease of functionalization, and unique optical and electronic properties. Recently, the gold nanoparticles are also found to induce the size-dependent interactions with living tissues. It has been found that gold nanoparticles of different sizes are uptaken by the cells in vitro and by the organs of living specimens in vivo at different rates. Herein, we report the use of gold nanoparticles of different sizes as a gene delivery agent. The gold nanoparticles of 10, 40, and 100 nm diameter were surface functionalized with cationic glycopolymer, and their biocompatibility under physiological conditions was investigated. The stable nanoparticles were then complexed with enhanced cyanine fluorescence protein plasmid (pECFP) and their transfection efficiencies in Hela cell line were studied. It was found that gold nanoparticles of 40 nm core diameter exhibit highest transfection efficiencies compared to the other sizes of nanoparticles studied.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".