MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056465421 · doi:10.1039/c2sc20542d

Catalytic enantioselective carbon-carbon bond formation using cycloisomerization reactions

2012· article· en· W2056465421 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCatalytic Alkyne Reactions
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCycloisomerizationEnantioselective synthesisIntramolecular forceHydroacylationChemistryEnyneCatalysisCombinatorial chemistryOlefin fiberOrganic chemistryStereochemistryRhodium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This review describes important recent advancements in asymmetric cycloisomerization reactions. A wide variety of catalytic and asymmetric strategies have been applied to these reactions over the past twenty years. Cycloisomerization reactions have the ability to produce diverse polycyclic compounds in excellent yields and selectivity. They constitute a powerful and efficient strategy for asymmetric carbon-carbon bond formation in cyclic compounds. Enyne and related olefin cyclizations comprise the majority of reactions of this type and important advances have recently occurred in this area. However, significant changes have also occurred in the area of classical cyclization as well as intramolecular hydroacylation and C–H activation initiated cyclization and these will also be described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it