Process-Structure-Property Relationships for Magnesium Alloys
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gravity step-casting experiments were performed to investigate process-structure-property relationships in three different die-cast magnesium alloys – AM60, AZ91 and AE44. The step-cast mold was instrumented to capture temperature profiles of the solidification of molten magnesium. This paper investigates the structure-property relationships of these magnesium alloys, specifically the dependence of the fracture properties upon the porosity that forms during the casting process. Sixteen tensile specimens were cut from the step-casting perpendicular to the solidification front, for each alloy examined. Correlations from X-ray tomography data were used to estimate the maximum area fraction of porosity from the average volumetric porosity in the specimens, assuming a typical size and spatial distribution of porosity. This relationship can be used in the absence of more accurate measure of porosity (i.e. serial sectioning, computed x-ray tomography). A failure model for die-cast alloys – which depends upon the strain-hardening coefficient and the maximum area fraction of porosity in the specimen – was used to predict fracture strains for each specimen. The experimental tensile elongation of each specimen was compared with predicted values. The resulting mechanical properties determined from these cast magnesium alloys will be used to develop process-structure-property relationships.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".