MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056498055 · doi:10.1188/14.onf.573

The Editor Who Loves to Write

2014· editorial· en· W2056498055 on OpenAlexaff
Anne Katz

Bibliographic record

VenueOncology nursing forum · 2014
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReflective Practices in Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePoetryVisual artsLiteratureArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ever since I was a young child, I have loved to write. Stories in grade school, creative essays in high school, mournful adolescent poetry, papers at university, more recently books (10 of them in total), and of course, editorials. Like many, I used to write in longhand, often in a notebook or on paper that was specially chosen for the project. Now the click and clack of the keyboard is the soundtrack of my process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.061
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.094

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.061
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0100.005
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0090.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.030

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.424 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOncology nursing forumSame topicReflective Practices in EducationFrench-language works237,207