MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mechanisms of selection mediated by interleukin‐7, the preBCR, and hemokinin‐1 during B‐cell development

2004· review· en· W2056510089 on OpenAlexaff
Craig D. Milne, Heather E. Fleming, Yu Zhang, Christopher J. Paige

Bibliographic record

VenueImmunological Reviews · 2004
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChemokine receptors and signaling
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLymphopoiesisBiologyStromal cellCell biologyProgenitor cellB cellReceptorImmunologyCellular differentiationStem cellCancer researchAntibodyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many of the stromal-derived signals and factors that regulate B lymphopoiesis have been identified. We review recent evidence from our laboratory that shows that there are at least three phases during B-cell development when cells direct their own maturation, independent of stromal cells. Following the expression of the preB-cell receptor (preBCR), cells acquire the ability to proliferate in low levels of interleukin-7 (IL-7), which acts as a self-selecting mechanism to expand cells that have successfully expressed a preBCR in environments that are non-permissive to preBCR- cells. Second, the preBCR is required for a contact-mediated event between B-cell progenitors. Disruption at this stage prevents the further maturation of progenitors to the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-responsive stage. Finally, the transition from IL-7 receptor to mature antigen receptor-based signaling is enhanced by a novel member of the tachykinin family, hemokinin-1. This series of maturation, survival, and differentiation signals is generated by B-lineage cells as they progress through developmental checkpoints on the way to becoming functionally mature cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImmunological ReviewsSame topicChemokine receptors and signalingFrench-language works237,207