MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056516471 · doi:10.1016/j.artres.2015.02.001

A new teaching model of the systemic circulation that incorporates reservoir characteristics

2015· article· en· W2056516471 on OpenAlexaff
John V. Tyberg, J. Christopher Bouwmeester, Lindsay M. Burrowes, Kim H. Parker, Nigel G. Shrive, Jiun‐Jr Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueArtery Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryLibin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSystemic circulationCirculation (fluid dynamics)Internal medicineMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A hydraulic teaching model of the human systemic circulation is proposed, based on the principles of the reservoir-wave approach.Reservoir characteristics are portrayed by the arterial tall-and-narrow and venous short-and-wide columns, the relative compliances of which are signified by their diameters.Wave characteristics are represented by proximal arterial and venous resistances; rapid left ventricular ejection and rapid right atrial filling cause flow-dependent pressure drops across the respective resistances.(The value of the proximal arterial resistance is numerically equal to the characteristic impedance.)The pressure drop across the proximal arterial resistance, excess pressure, is understood to be fundamentally wave-related and has been shown to be a measure of the efficiency of cardiac-vascular coupling.Excess pressure also predicts an incremental risk of cardiovascular morbidity and largely accounts for the hysteresis evidenced by an open aortic pressure-volume loop.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score0.196

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.212
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArtery ResearchSame topicCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionFrench-language works237,207