O estranho, o estranhamento e o estrangeiro em Monique Proulx e Clarice Lispector
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumo: Esse texto aborda o estranho, o estranhamento e o estrangeiro a partir de alguns contos da literatura do Québec (Les aurores montréales, de Monique Proulx) e de outras narrativas, de Clarice Lispector. Para desenvolver o tema, serão focalizados: o insulamento feminino e a descoberta do “eu”; a adolescência e a experiência do estranho; e, finalmente, o olhar do estrangeiro e o sentimento de ser estrangeiro/estrangeira.Palavras-chave: Literatura comparada; literatura canadense; Monique Proulx; literatura brasileira; Clarice Lispector; estranhamento.Résumé: Ce texte aborde l’étrange, l’étrangeté à partir des quelques nouvelles de la littérature du Québec (Les aurores montréales, de Monique Proulx) et d’autres récits, de Clarice Lispector. Pour développer le thème, les aspects suivants seront priveligiés: l’isolement féminin et la découverte du “moi”; l’enfance, l’adolescence et l’expérience de l’étrangeté; et, finalment, le regard de l’étranger et le sentiment d’être étranger/étrangère.Mots-clés: Littérature comparée; littérature canadienne; Monique Proulx; littérature brésilienne; Clarice Lispector; étrangeté.Keywords: Comparative literature; Canadian literature; Monique Proulx; Brazilian literature; Clarice Lispector; estrangement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it