MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056612324 · doi:10.3917/riges.333.0074

Le courage des leaders

2008· article· fr· W2056612324 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Michelle Harbour, Veronika Kisfalvi

Bibliographic record

VenueGestion · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicLeadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
Canadian institutionsHEC MontréalUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCourageHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophySociologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé «Le leader doit faire preuve de courage !» Cette expression se pose comme une évidence si on conçoit le leadership comme une double compétence de prédilection pour faire face aux difficultés et aux risques. Malgré le flou qui entoure ces deux compétences, il semble exister une grande proximité entre elles. Cet article présente, d’une part, les liens faits dans la littérature entre ces deux compétences et, d’autre part, les résultats d’une recherche portant sur la conception du courage de diriger en contexte de fusion, selon cinq hauts gestionnaires ayant agi comme leaders du projet. Ces résultats montrent que le courage de diriger est un concept lié au leadership, à la confiance et à des intérêts. Les applications dans la gestion des compétences sont également abordées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.189
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGestionSame topicLeadership, Courage, and Heroism StudiesFrench-language works237,207