MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056617099 · doi:10.1109/icecs.2006.379672

Multiparameters monitoring for long term in-vivo characterization of electrode-tissues contacts

2006· article· en· W2056617099 on OpenAlexafffund
Guillaume Lesbros, Mohamad Sawan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neural Engineering
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersCanada Research ChairsCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCMC Microsystems
KeywordsElectrical impedanceCMOSElectrodeCyclic voltammetryDielectric spectroscopyMaterials scienceComputer scienceElectronic engineeringElectrochemistryElectrical engineeringAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OptoelectronicsChemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper concerns the design of an integrated circuit (IC) dedicated to monitor electrode-tissues contact (ETC). It is the main module of an implantable telemetry device. This device allows one to apply various principles of electrochemical system's studies, such as cyclic voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, galvanostatic double pulse method, and thus, to measure the evolution of various parameters surrarounding the ETC: complex impedance, faradic resistance, double layer capacity, rheobase current and chronaxy time. The circuit has been designed and implemented with the CMOS 0.18μm technology with an area of 2mm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> . The proposed technique and the IC functionalities were validated in our laboratory during <i xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">in-vitro</i> experimentations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.384

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringFrench-language works237,207