MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056697014 · doi:10.1109/ias.1997.629072

Self-started voltage-source series-resonant converter for high power induction heating and melting applications

2002· article· en· W2056697014 on OpenAlexaff
P. Jain, José Espinoza, S.B. Dewan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInduction Heating and Inverter Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapacitorTransformerInduction heatingInverterTopology (electrical circuits)VoltageElectronic engineeringTransient (computer programming)Electrical engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceElectromagnetic coil

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An inverter configuration for high power induction heating and melting applications is presented. The proposed inverter covers loads with quality factors up to 12 while featuring self-starting capabilities. This is achieved by properly distributing the compensated capacitor between the primary and the secondary of the matching transformer. The transient analysis of the configuration defines the maximum ratio of the primary and secondary capacitors in order to assure self-starting. On the other hand, the steady state analysis defines the minimum ratio to limit the operating flux level of the matching transformer to a safe level. This paper identifies the sources of self-starting failures in the standard configuration and presents the transient and steady state analyses towards a systematic procedure of components design for the proposed topology. Experimental results on a laboratory prototype to prove the theoretical considerations are also included.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInduction Heating and Inverter TechnologyFrench-language works237,207