Effects of symmetry-breaking perturbations on excitonic states bound to systems of reduced symmetry
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using an invariant expansion, we build an Hamiltonian describing the influence of the crystal-field, the electron-hole exchange interaction, and any symmetry-breaking perturbations on the fine structure of excitons bound to systems of reduced symmetry: D2d, C3v, and C2v. Several perturbations are considered, including, but not limited to, an electric field, a magnetic field, a strain field, and their combinations. For each symmetry system considered, symmetrized excitonic wave functions, build from heavy- and light-holes states, are used to expand the Hamiltonian in the form of matrices, whose eigenvalues directly provide the energy of the excitonic states and whose eigenstates can be used to determine oscillator strengths of optical transitions. Using this model, we satisfactorily reproduce the excitonic emission observed from nitrogen dyads in GaAs and tellurium dyads in strained ZnSe. We also present Hamiltonians for independent heavy- and light-hole subsystems. Comparing the two models, we demonstrate that the splitting observed in strained quantum dots of C2v symmetry does not necessarily imply a significant anisotropic exchange interaction. This splitting can be produced by a weak coupling between heavy- and light-hole bands.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it