Performance analysis of two‐way opportunistic decode‐and‐forward based systems in Nakagami‐ <i>m</i> fading environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper studies the performance of a two‐way relay‐based communication system with opportunistic relay selection in Nakagami‐ m fading environments. The authors consider a two‐way wireless communication system where two nodes, acting as sources and using different modulation schemes for transmission, are unable to exchange data because of deep fading on their direct link and proceed via L relay terminals. They provide closed‐form expression for the probability density function of the link between the ‘selected’ best relay and each source, and use this result to derive a closed‐form expression for the average symbol error probability which, to the best knowledge of the authors, has never been done before. This result is further approximated for the high signal‐to‐noise ratio regions and used to develop closed‐form expressions for the optimised power allocated to each node involved in the communication process. The authors asset their formulae with numerical results and interpretations to complete this work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".