MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mapping Early Patents on Baker's Yeast Manufacture

2010· article· en· W2056727825 on OpenAlexaff
Pierre Gélinas

Bibliographic record

VenueComprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFermentation and Sensory Analysis
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersOffice of Science
KeywordsYeastAutomationTasteFood scienceBiotechnologyBusinessBiologyEngineeringBiochemistryMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the 19th century, bread had a pronounced acidic taste and a nonuniform appearance, as shown by a review of 178 early patents families on baker's yeast manufacture. This was largely due to the unpredictable nature of baker's yeast, which was generally grown under empiric conditions in nonsterile dough or liquid prepared with saccharified cereals. Inventors were mainly interested in techniques to increase yields of pressed yeast through media formulation, infection control, and automation of biomass separation and packaging. Still in its infancy, baker's yeast technology was slow to develop and apply new ideas due to lack of awareness on information published in patents and the scientific literature. This review also gives background information on early patents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.818
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food SafetySame topicFermentation and Sensory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207