Impact of the N5-proximal Asn on the Thermodynamic and Kinetic Stability of the Semiquinone Radical in Photolyase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Flavoproteins can dramatically adjust the thermodynamics and kinetics of electron transfer at their flavin cofactor. A versatile regulatory tool is proton transfer. Here, we demonstrate the significance of proton-coupled electron transfer to redox tuning and semiquinone (sq) stability in photolyases (PLs) and cryptochromes (CRYs). These light-responsive proteins share homologous overall architectures and FAD-binding pockets, yet they have evolved divergent functions that include DNA repair, photomorphogenesis, regulation of circadian rhythm, and magnetoreception. We report the first measurement of both FAD redox potentials for cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer PL (CPD-PL, Anacystis nidulans). These values, E(1)(hq/sq) = -140 mV and E(2)(sq/ox) = -219 mV, where hq is FAD hydroquinone and ox is oxidized FAD, establish that the sq is not thermodynamically stabilized (ΔE = E(2) - E(1) = -79 mV). Results with N386D CPD-PL support our earlier hypothesis of a kinetic barrier to sq oxidation associated with proton transfer. Both E(1) and E(2) are upshifted by ∼ 100 mV in this mutant; replacing the N5-proximal Asn with Asp decreases the driving force for sq oxidation. However, this Asp alleviates the kinetic barrier, presumably by acting as a proton shuttle, because the sq in N386D CPD-PL oxidizes orders of magnitude more rapidly than wild type. These data clearly reveal, as suggested for plant CRYs, that an N5-proximal Asp can switch on proton transfer and modulate sq reactivity. However, the effect is context-dependent. More generally, we propose that PLs and CRYs tune the properties of their N5-proximal residue to adjust the extent of proton transfer, H-bonding patterns, and changes in protein conformation associated with electron transfer at the flavin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".