MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Free Vibration of Open Circular Cylindrical Composite Shells with Point Supports

2005· article· en· W2056738769 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Aerospace Engineering · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Structure Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVibrationDisplacement fieldRotary inertiaMathematical analysisShell (structure)Displacement (psychology)GeometryMathematicsInertiaPhysicsClassical mechanicsStructural engineeringFinite element methodMaterials scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A variational full-field method is presented in this paper for the free vibration analysis of open circular cylindrical laminated shells supported at discrete points. A differential equation in matrix form is developed using the first-order shear deformable theory of shells, and rotary inertia is included. The displacement fields are defined by using very high-order interpolating polynomials and a large number of preselected nodal points on the reference surface of the shell. Each nodal point has 5 degrees of freedom, three displacement components, and two components of the rotation of the normal to the reference surface. The stiffness and mass matrices are obtained using the strain and kinetic energy functions. The numerical results are calculated for shallow and deep circular cylindrical panels with four-, six-, and eight-point supports along the two parallel straight edges. The values of the natural frequency obtained from the present method show good agreement with published data in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it