MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056763492 · doi:10.1002/ijc.23174

Coactivator requirements for p53‐dependent transcription in the yeast <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>

2007· article· en· W2056763492 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmed F. Yousef, Guo Wei Xu, Megan Mendez, Christopher J. Brandl, Joe S. Mymryk

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Cancer · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
KeywordsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeBiologyCoactivatorTranscription factorTranscription (linguistics)YeastCell biologyGeneticsActivator (genetics)Gene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

p53 is a sequence-specific DNA-binding transcription factor and key regulator of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. p53 is mutated in most human cancers and these mutations generally impair its ability to activate transcription. When expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, p53 acts as a strong transcriptional activator allowing yeast to be used as a model system to study the effects of p53 mutations on activity. However, little is known about the exact mechanisms by which p53 functions in yeast. Using 76 mutant yeast strains, we have evaluated the effect of deleting components of the ADA, COMPASS, INO80, ISW1, Mediator, RSC, SAGA, SAS, SLIK, SWI/SNF, and SWR1 transcriptional regulatory complexes on p53-dependent transcription. In addition, we examined the role of histone H2B ubiquitylation by Rad6/Bre1 on p53 activation. Overall, our analysis indicates that there are several remarkable similarities between p53-dependent transcription in yeast and mammalian cells, suggesting that yeast can serve as a valid model system for at least some aspects of p53 function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of CancerSame topicGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsFrench-language works237,207