MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact Extrusion of Aluminium Alloy Cans: Development of Ellipsoidal Cans as Storage Containers for Electrochemical Energy Systems

2012· article· en· W2056785810 on OpenAlexaff
T.D. Mercy, Rahul Sharma, V.F. Kaladharan, K.P. Kamalakaran, Sundar Rajan Aravamuthan, G. Balachander

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials science forum · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAluminum Alloys Composites Properties
Canadian institutionsImpactImperial Metals (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtrusionMaterials scienceAluminiumAlloyBattery (electricity)Work (physics)Process (computing)EllipsoidEnergy storageMechanical engineeringMetallurgyComposite materialComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aluminium alloy cans are generally used as containers for electrochemical energy systems like capacitors and advanced batteries. Packing efficiency of batteries depends upon their configuration. Containers in prismatic, cylindrical and elliptic-cylindrical shapes are generally used for battery applications. Elliptic-cylindrical shape has the advantage of better heat dissipation and good packing efficiency in battery assembly. Safety device to be provided in the cans requires material in the minimum half hard (H14) condition. In the present work, ellipsoidal cans of Al-Mn alloy were successfully realised by impact extrusion process. Mechanical properties of the cans were analysed through to ensure the adequacy of the process and it has been demonstrated that impact extrusion is a viable process for making cans for batteries with required mechanical properties, for the can in total and for the safety device in particular.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.710

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials science forumSame topicAluminum Alloys Composites PropertiesFrench-language works237,207