MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056816798 · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.166

Outcome Analysis of Severe Chordee Correction Using Tunica Vaginalis as a Flap in Boys With Proximal Hypospadias

2007· article· en· W2056816798 on OpenAlexaff
Luis H. Braga, João L. Pippi Salle, Sumit Davé, Darius Bägli, Armando J. Lorenzo, Antoine E. Khoury

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Urology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypospadiasMedicineChordeeTunica vaginalisSurgeryPenisScrotumTunica albuginea (penis)DeglovingUrethraAnatomyUrethroplasty

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: There is ongoing controversy regarding optimal treatment for severe ventral curvature. It has been suggested that ventral corporeal lengthening may be associated with recurrent curvature and erectile dysfunction. To further assess these issues we reviewed our experience with ventral penile lengthening for correcting the severe ventral curvature associated with proximal hypospadias. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 38 boys with severe hypospadias and congenital ventral curvature greater than 45 degrees who were treated at our institution from 1995 to 2004 with placement of a flap or graft in the corporeal bodies to straighten the phallus. Of the patients 21 had perineal and 17 had penoscrotal hypospadias, including 22 with associated penoscrotal transposition and/or bifid scrotum and 6 with ambiguous genitalia. Testosterone stimulation before surgery was given in 11 children at surgeon discretion. RESULTS: Median age at surgery was 15 months. The urethral plate was divided in 94.7% of patients. A tunica vaginalis flap was used alone in 23 cases and associated with dura, pericardium or small intestinal submucosa in 8, 2 and 1, respectively. The remaining 4 patients underwent ventral grafting alone, including lyophilized dura in 1, pericardium in 1 and dermis in 1. Urethral reconstruction was achieved by the transverse island flap technique or 1 of its modifications in 34 children. Four boys underwent a 2-stage procedure. Followup available on 35 of 38 patients was 1 to 11 years (median 5.3). Recurrent ventral curvature in 5 of 35 patients was mild in 1 and clinically significant, requiring re-intervention, in 4. Four of 9 patients (44.4%) who underwent corporeal grafting with lyophilized dura had recurrent ventral curvature vs 1 of 23 (4.3%) who had a tunica vaginalis flap (chi-square 5.14, p = 0.02). At last followup straight erections were documented by patients and/or parents in 30 of 35 children (85.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The short-term outcome of ventral penile lengthening using tunica vaginalis flap alone for correcting severe chordee is favorable with a 95% success rate. Dural grafts were associated with a higher risk of recurrent ventral curvature compared to tunica vaginalis flaps. Although most of our patients were not yet adults, when chordee and erectile dysfunction may become apparent, we believe that tunica vaginalis flap repair is a good option for correcting severe ventral curvature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations69
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of UrologySame topicUrological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207