MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056827411 · doi:10.1088/0022-3727/46/3/035304

X-band EMI shielding mechanisms and shielding effectiveness of high structure carbon black/polypropylene composites

2012· article· en· W2056827411 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics D Applied Physics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectromagnetic wave absorption materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectromagnetic shieldingEMIMaterials scienceComposite materialReflection lossElectromagnetic interferenceComposite numberCarbon blackReflection (computer programming)Absorption (acoustics)PolypropyleneAttenuationShielding effectElectromagnetic radiationOpticsElectrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding effectiveness (SE) and EMI shielding mechanisms of high structure carbon black (HS-CB)/polypropylene (PP) composites in the X-band frequency range were studied. Composite plates with three different thicknesses and five different electrical conductivities were studied. The reflection loss and absorption loss of the composites were quantified based on the electromagnetic radiation power balance. The results showed that for HS-CB/PP composites, absorption loss contribution to the overall attenuation is more than the contribution of the reflection loss. The ability of the theoretical model to predict the EMI shielding by reflection and absorption was found to be a function of the shielding plate thickness and conductivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it