MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056828219 · doi:10.1139/o06-091

Purification and characterization of a nonpolymerizing long-pitch actin dimer

2006· article· en· W2056828219 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Braden Sweeting, John F. Dawson

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular Mechanics and Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsDimerActinActin-binding proteinPolymerizationMutantPhalloidinBiophysicsActin remodelingDeoxyribonuclease IMicrofilamentChemistryBiologyCrystallographyBiochemistryActin cytoskeletonCytoskeletonPolymerDNACellOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atomic resolution structures of filamentous actin have not been obtained owing to the self-association of actin under crystallization conditions. Obtaining short filamentous actin complexes of defined lengths is therefore a highly desirable goal. Here we report the production and isolation of a long-pitch actin dimer employing chemical crosslinking between wild-type actin and Q41C/C374A mutant actin. The Q41C/C374A mutant actin possessed altered polymerization properties, with a 2-fold reduction in the rate of elongation and an increased critical concentration relative to wild-type actin. The Q41C/C374A mutant actin also displayed an increase in the IC50 for DNase I, a pointed-end actin-binding protein. The long-pitch dimer was bound by DNase I to prevent polymerization and purified. It was found that each actin dimer is bound by 2 DNase I molecules, 1 likely bound to each of the actin protomers. The long-pitch dimer bound by DNase I did not form short F actin structures, as assessed by the binding of rhodamine-phalloidin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicCellular Mechanics and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207