Developmental competence of 8–16-cell stage bison embryos produced by interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Altered communication between nuclear and cytoplasmic components has been linked to impaired development in interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer (iSCNT) embryos as a result of genetic divergence between the two species. This study investigated the developmental potential and mitochondrial function of cattle (Bos taurus), plains bison (Bison bison bison) and wood bison (Bison bison athabascae) embryos produced by iSCNT using domestic cattle oocytes as cytoplasts. Embryos in all groups were analysed for development, accumulation of ATP, apoptosis and gene expression of nuclear- and mitochondrial-encoded genes at the 8-16-cell stage. The results of this study showed no significant differences in the proportion of developed embryos at the 2-, 4- and 8-16-cell stages between groups. However, significantly higher ATP levels were observed in cattle SCNT embryos compared with bison iSCNT embryos. Significantly more condensed and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labelling (TUNEL)-positive nuclei were found in plains bison iSCNT embryos. No significant differences in the expression levels of nuclear respiratory factor 2 (NRF2) or mitochondrial subunit 2 of cytochrome c oxidase (mt-COX2) were found in any of the groups. However, mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM) expression significantly differed between groups. The results of this study provide insights into the potential causes that might lead to embryonic arrest in bison iSCNT embryos, including mitochondrial dysfunction, increased apoptosis and abnormal gene expression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".