Characteristics of rectal perception are altered in irritable bowel syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A hallmark symptom of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a lower pain threshold during rectal distension, but the mechanism underlying this disorder remains unclear. Examining the relationship between physiological and perceptual responses to rectal distension can provide insight into the underlying peripheral or central dysfunction in IBS. Therefore, we carried out a study of the rectal sensations of urge to defecate, pain and unpleasantness in relation to the varying states of the rectum. Ten IBS patients and 13 healthy controls underwent six sets of isobaric rectal distensions. The first set was ascending stepwise distensions terminating upon report of moderate pain where verbal ratings of urge, pain, and unpleasantness were acquired. The remaining sets were phasic or tonic distensions at a single pressure eliciting either moderate urge or moderate pain intensity where subjects gave continuous ratings of urge or pain percepts. The McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) was used to assess different qualities of the pain experience during single pressure distensions. Abnormalities in IBS patients included: (1) higher incidence of distensions where unpleasantness is greater than pain intensity, (2) significantly longer persistence of ratings after stimulus termination during phasic distensions eliciting either moderate urge or moderate pain, (3) significantly smaller ratings fluctuations during tonic distensions, and (4) significantly higher MPQ scores for painful tonic distensions. Our study demonstrates that IBS patients have abnormal temporal and intensity properties of rectal sensation. These can be accounted for by either altered peripheral neuromuscular processing and/or processing of ascending rectal input in the central nervous system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".