MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056925809 · doi:10.1353/mdr.0.0118

Understanding Tony Kushner (review)

2009· article· en· W2056925809 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Robert Vorlicky

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Drama · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDramaCriticismArt historyHistoryArtLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Understanding Tony Kushner Robert Vorlicky James Fisher. Understanding Tony Kushner. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2008. Pp. 207. $39.95 (Hb). James Fisher is one of Tony Kushner’s most prolific critics. His notable Theater of Tony Kushner: Living Past Hope was preceded and followed by numerous essays, production reviews, and edited collections focusing on Kushner. Fisher was named “Indiana Theatre Person of the Year” by the Indiana Theatre Association in 1997 for his direction of Angels in America, Part One: Millennium Approaches at Wabash College. Most recently, Fisher published his edited collection, “We Will Be Citizens”: New Essays on Gay and Lesbian Drama, which includes his own essay [End Page 373] on the mainstreaming of gay drama vis-à-vis the unparalleled success of Angels. Fisher finds in the Understanding Contemporary American Literature series at the University of South Carolina Press an opportunity to reach both a broader audience and to speak more broadly about Kushner than in previous publications. The series, founded in 1985 by general editor Matthew J. Bruccoli (who died last year after shepherding close to fifty titles to publication), states that its mission is to provide instruction in how to read certain contemporary writers – identifying and explicating their material, themes, use of language, point of view, structures, symbolism, and responses to experience . . . Although the criticism and analysis in the series have been aimed at a level of general accessibility, these introductory volumes are meant to be applied in conjunction with the works they cover. (vii) Responding to this mission, the book’s opening chapter identifies phrases and ideas that strive to capture the essence of Kushner’s artistry. In the next four chapters – discussing A Bright Room Called Day (1985), Hydriotaphia, or The Death of Dr. Browne (1986), Angels in America (1991–92), Homebody/Kabul (2001), and Caroline, or Change (2003) – Fisher repeats these phrases and ideas throughout. The result links compositions together but inadequately explores the ways in which the writings function independently of one another. His methodology, too, seems to stem from the series’ commitment to “instruct” readers on how to read Kushner in order to understand resonances between his texts. References to “American lyric realism” (especially in the hands of Tennessee Williams) and “Brechtian technique,” for example, appear as the essential lenses through which to appreciate Kushner’s plays. While these influences are unquestionable (and are indeed instructional in “understanding Kushner”), their application from play to play – at the expense of other critical, theoretical perspectives – tends to dilute the intricate layering of Kushner’s techniques, themes, tropes, and theatricalities. Yet the book is filled with many striking moments, particularly when the critic engages the originality, authority, and sheer brilliance of Kushner’s accomplishments. For example, Fisher reminds us of the indisputable significance of Angels: the play seized the conscience of a nation unravelling the connections among individual, community, and national identities amid the AIDS crisis. From Fisher’s perspective, Angels is the creation of an artist who lived truthfully and fully at the present moment of his culture’s pulsating centre. A decade later, as Fisher acknowledges, the artist tackled the timely crises of international tensions in Homebody/Kabul, which presents, in dramatic form, a less coherent, colliding chain reaction among global, national, community, and individual identities. Fisher is [End Page 374] generous in letting the playwright speak in his own words, as in the pause for reflection between his discussions of the two plays. America must, as Kushner puts it, “behave justly with the rest of the world” (71). “If we do that,” he goes on, “if we can tackle the question of our place in the world, we can begin the new century in a spirit of transformation and justice” (71). Positioning Kushner between and of two worlds – artist and citizen – allows the critic to address the driving forces and undeterred quests of Kushner the playwright and the man. Fisher brings to his analyses an invaluable knowledge of Kushner’s unpublished texts, knowledge that highlights connections rarely noted in previous studies. (I look forward to a future study that looks even more closely at the earliest of Kushner’s writings, including The Age of Assassins [1982], The Protozoa...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.187

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0560.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern DramaSame topicTheatre and Performance StudiesFrench-language works237,207