Response of Layers to Dietary Flaxseed According to Body Weight Classification at Maturity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A trial was conducted with layers weight-sorted into small (1200-1285 g), medium 1 (1360-1395 g), medium 2 (1430-1460 g), or heavy (1555-1600 g) body weight classifications at 18 wk and fed 0, 10, or 20% flaxseed. Regardless of weight classification, feeding 20% flaxseed resulted in inadequate weight gain, reduced egg production, and increased feed intake. It was hypothesized that smaller birds would be less able to increase their feed intake in response to flax (due to reduced nutrient digestibility or antinutrients) and so show more severe loss in egg production. This situation did not occur, since all birds adjusted their intake to a comparable level. It is concluded that lower egg production seen in birds fed high levels of flaxseed may be due to the presence of antinutrients or reduced AMEn of the diet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".