Les activités forestières dans deux communautés agricoles du Nouvel-Ontario,1900-1920
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'examen des activités forestières à l'échelle locale au cours des deux premières décennies du xxe siècle permet à l'auteur d'ajouter une nouvelle perspective à l'étude de ces activités en milieu agricole. Les terres et les forêts de deux communautés canadiennes-françaises du Nouvel-Ontario, Blezard et Hanmer, ont été découpées sur une base cantonale et ont fait l'objet de nombreuses évaluations consignées dans deux sources gouvernementales, soit le registre des concessions forestières — plus connu des chercheurs — et le registre de coupes du district de Sudbury, document majeur, méconnu et souvent disparu dans les autres régions. Les données recueillies permettent de relativiser la place des activités de coupe sur les lots agricoles et d'esquisser l'hypothèse de trois étapes dans le déroulement de l'abattage de la matière ligneuse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".