Spatial mapping of growing degree days: an application of MODIS-based surface temperatures and enhanced vegetation index
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Growing degree days (GDD) is a simple temperature-based index of biological development. In this paper we evaluated the potential of using 2003-2005 MODIS-based 8-day and 16-day composites of daytime surface temperature (TS) and enhanced vegetation index (EVI) values at 250 m resolution for mapping GDD. The work was applied to the Canadian Atlantic Maritime Ecozone as a demonstration of the methodology. The work proceeded by establishing an empirical relationship between mean tower-based estimates of TS for the MODIS-acquisition period of 10:30 am-12:00 pm and the daily mean TS calculated from half-hourly emitted infrared/longwave radiation measurements taken from four flux sites in southern commercial forests of Canada. The relationship revealed a strong correlation between variables (r2=98.4%) and was central to the calculation of daily mean TS from MODIS-based estimates of TS. Since seasonally-based estimates of GDD and EVI were strongly correlated (r2=87%), data fusion techniques were applied to enhance the GDD map originally produced at 1 km resolution (from infrared emission band data), to 250 m. In general, the MODIS-derived map of GDD showed a positive constant offset of about 511 degree days from calculated long-term averages (1971 2000) based on temperatures collected at 101 Environment Canada climate stations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".