MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057025503 · doi:10.1029/2004jc002451

Principal bed states during SandyDuck97: Occurrence, spectral anisotropy, and the bed state storm cycle

2005· article· en· W2057025503 on OpenAlexaff
Alex E. Hay, Todd Mudge

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCoastal and Marine Dynamics
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyBedformSeabedSea stateStormGeomorphologyAnisotropySubmarine pipelineRippleGeodesySedimentPhysicsGeotechnical engineeringOceanographySediment transportOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Results are presented from 70+ days of nearly continuous in situ acoustic imagery of the nearshore sandy seabed in ∼3‐m mean water depth, at two locations separated by 40‐m cross‐shore distance. The bottom sediments were 150 μm median diameter sand, with nearly identical size distributions at the two locations. Five principal bed states were observed: irregular ripples, cross ripples, linear transition ripples, lunate megaripples, and flat bed. The linear transition and flat bed states were the most frequent, together accounting for 68% of the total time. Bed state occurrence was a strong function of incident wave energy, each bed state occurring within a relatively narrow range of sea‐and‐swell energies. During the 12 major storm events spanned by the record, the bed response was characterized by a repeatable bed state storm cycle, involving four of the five principal states (lunate megaripples did not appear repeatedly, and thus may be a special case), with no obvious dependence of bed state occurrence on prior bed state, or on third‐moment measures of wave nonlinearity. Radial spectra from the rotary acoustic images indicate pronounced differences in the anisotropy of spatial scales for the different bed states, and exhibit onshore‐offshore differences which are likely related to ripple migration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicCoastal and Marine DynamicsFrench-language works237,207