Titanium nitride–carbon nanotube core–shell composites as effective electrocatalyst supports for low temperature fuel cells
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Titanium nitride–carbon nanotube (TiN–CNT) core–shell nanocomposites were developed by a simplistic two step fabrication procedure and characterized by transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction and thermogravimetric analysis. These materials were utilized as platinum nanoparticle electrocatalyst supports (Pt/TiN–CNT) for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and methanol oxidation reaction (MOR), two important low temperature fuel cell processes. Improved ORR and MOR activities were demonstrated for Pt/TiN–CNTs compared with state of the art commercial Pt/C. Moreover, enhanced CO tolerance towards the MOR was demonstrated attributed to the interaction occurring between adsorbed CO molecules and the TiN–CNT supports. TiN–CNTs are thus presented as highly promising, novel electrocatalyst support materials with enhanced ORR and MOR performance attributed to their anisotropic morphology, enhanced electronic properties and conductivity, and distinct catalyst–support interactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it