Avaliação da dor durante a troca de curativo de úlceras de perna
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O estudo visou avaliar a dor em úlceras de perna, durante a troca de curativo e identificar os procedimentos mais dolorosos na opinião de usuários do SUS. Estudo transversal, conduzido com 76 usuários com úlceras de perna, sendo 69,8% homens, com média de idade de 57,8 anos (dp=13,2), atendidos em Unidades Básicas de Saúde e Ambulatório do Hospital das Clínicas de Goiânia, Goiás. Para avaliação da dor utilizou-se a Escala Numérica (0-10) e o Questionário de Dor de McGill. A ocorrência de dor durante o curativo foi de 76,3%, de intensidade moderada (Med=5, Q1=3, Q3=8, Min=1; Máx=10). Qualitativamente, a dor foi descrita como cansativa (63,2%) e latejante (55,3%). Os procedimentos mais dolorosos na opinião dos usuários incluíram a limpeza da ferida e a retirada do curativo anterior. A dor durante a troca de curativo de úlceras de perna foi frequente e exacerbada no momento da limpeza e retirada do curativo anterior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".