MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057095017 · doi:10.1016/s0749-8063(00)90053-7

Endoscopic Plantar Fascia Release

2000· article· en· W2057095017 on OpenAlexaff
Darrell Ogilvie‐Harris, Joel Lobo

Bibliographic record

VenueArthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTendon Structure and Treatment
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalToronto Western HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePlantar fasciaHeelSurgeryFasciaMorning stiffnessPlantar fasciitisAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An anatomic exploration showed that reliable landmarks could allow a safe division of the plantar fascia. The reference line was the posterior border of the medial malleolus, 1 cm from the plantar skin. A clinical study on 53 patients (65 feet) showed that, at follow-up of over 2 years, the procedure effectively relieved heel pain in 89% of patients, morning stiffness in 92%, and allowed 71% to return to unrestricted sports activity. There were 2 complications with lateral heel pain. Patients must be properly selected, and must have had the full range of conservative treatment. Symptoms should have been intractable for approximately 1 year. In this group, good results can be expected with minimum short-term morbidity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.285
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related SurgerySame topicTendon Structure and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207