Neoproterozoic and Cambrian U–Pb (zircon) ages from Grand Manan Island, New Brunswick: implications for stratigraphy and northern Appalachian terrane correlations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pre-Mesozoic rocks are exposed on the southeastern third of Grand Manan Island and adjacent offshore islands in the Bay of Fundy. U–Pb (zircon) ages reported here demonstrate that most of these rocks are late Neoproterozoic to Early Cambrian. The oldest dated unit is the Ingalls Head Formation, from which two felsic tuff samples yielded ages of 617.6 ± 3.2 and 618.3 ± 2.8 Ma. The Three Islands granite, exposed only on offshore islands, is younger than the Ingalls Head Formation at 611.1 ± 2.4 Ma. It provides a minimum age for marble of the Kent Island Formation, which occurs as large xenoliths in the granite. The High Duck Island granite yielded an age of 547.3 ± 1.1 Ma, providing a minimum late Neoproterozoic age for the host Long Island Bay Formation. An age of 539.0 ± 3.3 Ma from a dacitic lithic-crystal tuff demonstrates that the Priest Cove Formation is earliest Cambrian; this supersedes a Silurian age previously suggested on the basis of poorly documented fossil evidence. The Long Pond Bay Formation is considered to be the youngest pre-Mesozoic unit on Grand Manan Island, based on petrological features, but a felsic intrusive sample from the unit yielded ca. 588 Ma xenocrystic zircon grains that provide only a maximum age for the unit. Although lack of exposed contacts or U–Pb ages from a few units precludes a complete stratigraphic picture, the ages reported here deomonstrate that most pre-Mesozoic units on Grand Manan Island are not Paleozoic as previously assumed. Some units on Grand Manan Island show similarities in rock types and ages to components in the Islesboro block in Penobscot Bay in coastal Maine. Overall, the range of ages and rock types suggests that they correlate with the New River and Mascarene terranes of southern New Brunswick, requiring an offset of at least 40 km between southern New Brunswick and adjacent Maine along the Grand Manan – Oak Bay fault system. Hence, both the Ganderia–Avalonia and Avalonia–Meguma boundaries lie farther offshore than Grand Manan Island.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".