MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057120152 · doi:10.1081/sta-120004912

PARAMETER ESTIMATION IN A PARTLY LINEAR REGRESSION MODEL WITH RANDOM COEFFICIENT AUTOREGRESSIVE ERRORS

2002· article· en· W2057120152 on OpenAlexaff
Jinhong You, Gemai Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsEstimatorAutoregressive modelMultivariate random variableStatisticsUnobservableCovarianceLinear regressionApplied mathematicsSTAR modelBounded functionRandom variableEconometricsMathematical analysisAutoregressive integrated moving averageTime series

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Consider a partly linear regression model where Yi 's are responses, and are fixed design points, is an unknown parameter vector, is an unknown bounded real-valued function defined on a compact subset of the real line , and are unobservable random errors. We study the above model when is a first-order random coefficient autoregressive process, i.e., a stationary solution of , where {zi } and {ei } are zero mean independent processes each consisting of i.i.d. random variables with finite second moments and respectively. Various estimators of β, θ and are investigated and their limit distributions established. Consistent estimators of the covariance matrices of the various estimators of β are also proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.484
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunication in Statistics- Theory and MethodsSame topicAdvanced Statistical Methods and ModelsFrench-language works237,207