MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057132785 · doi:10.1627/jpi.51.317

Research and Development towards Utilization of DME Powered Diesel Engines

2008· article· en· W2057132785 on OpenAlexaff
Mitsuharu Oguma, Shinichi Goto, Shinichi Suzuki, Shigemichi Yuki

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Japan Petroleum Institute · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle emissions and performance
Canadian institutionsDignitas International
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLubricityDiesel fuelAutomotive engineeringFuel injectionTruckDurabilityDimethyl etherEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceEngineeringMechanical engineeringChemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A series of research developments are summarized based on the research and development of a dimethyl ether (DME) medium-duty truck as below.- Examination of lubricity improvement which is an important fuel characteristic,- Engine and vehicle development,- Evaluation of the emission characteristics including trace levels of harmful substances,- Vehicle field test.Evaluation of lubricity used newly developed equipment to evaluate the effects of lubricity improvers. Checking the correlation between the durability of the injection pump and lubricity on fuel, and normalizing the equipment, allowed standardization of the evaluation method of lubricity for DME.Investigation of trace level emissions found that the unique fuel properties of DME affect the emission levels, so DME has great potential for satisfying more severe emission regulations compared to conventional diesel fuel.In vehicle and field testing, the overall quality of the DME truck was improved by solutions for the problems that occurred during the field tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Japan Petroleum InstituteSame topicVehicle emissions and performanceFrench-language works237,207