MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057164748 · doi:10.4012/dmj.27.433

Effect of Pulse Duration of Er: YAG Laser on Dentin Ablation

2008· article· en· W2057164748 on OpenAlex
Yuki Nishimoto, Masayuki Otsuki, Mônica Yamauti, T. Eguchi, Y. Sato, Richard M. FOXTON, Junji Tagami

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDental Materials Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLaser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
FundersTokyo Medical and Dental University
KeywordsMaterials scienceDentinAblationFluenceIrradiationPulse durationLaserPulse (music)Laser ablationVolume (thermodynamics)Er:YAG laserOpticsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study examined the effects on dentin ablation efficiency arising from various pulse durations of Er: YAG laser at a fixed energy fluence. Ten flat human dentin disks were prepared and exposed to an Er: YAG laser at 1 pps for three seconds at pulse durations of 100-500 microsec with 150 mJ/pulse (40.0 J/cm x pulse). The depth and diameter of the ablated dentin were measured and the ablation volume was estimated. Irradiated surfaces and cross-sections were observed using a SEM. Depth of the removed dentin increased and the diameter of the spot decreased without a change in the estimated volume at increased pulse durations. SEM observation of the irradiated surfaces revealed that there were no morphological differences when the pulse duration was changed. When the specimens were cross-sectioned, the ablated dentin had a dome shape and there was a dark layer under the irradiated surface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it