Screening Modern Berlin: Lola Runs to the Beat of a New Urban Symphony
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Berlin 1998 – ten years after the fall of the infamous concrete wall that once ran through the heart of Berlin, dividing the city and Germany into two separate geopolitical entities for forty years: this newly reconstructed national-cultural site is the locale for Tom Tykwer's film Lola rennt. With over two million viewers in 1998, it turned out to be one of the most successful German film productions in recent years. It was no doubt the fireworks of film techniques and the energetic speed of the action driven by the hip techno sound track (written by Tykwer himself) that made this relatively short film a sensational success not only in Germany, but also on the international market. While its extrinsic proximity to MTV videos explains its popularity with the so-called Generation X with its predilection for speed and visual over-stimulation, Lola rennt presents on closer view a serious contemplation of socio-cultural issues concerning today's Berlin. As a film taking place in Berlin, Lola rennt is at the same time a film about Berlin, indebted to a long tradition of classic Berlin city films from Metropolis Berlin by Fritz Lang (1926) to Der Himmel uber Berlin by Wim Wenders (1987). In this line of Berlin city films, Lola rennt shows an affinity to one in pa rticular, namely Walter Ruttmann's Berlin: Die Sinfonie einer Grosstadt, released in 1927. Since reviews of Tykwer's film have not noted the obvious analogies between the two films (Chappell; Rudolph; Whalen; Yakowar), this a rticle will explore these analogies and highlight the significance of Lola rennt as a filmic recreation of Berlin's urban space and its social and cultural texture at the end of the twentieth century. argument put forward here is that Ruttmann's Berlin: Die Sinfonie einer Grosstadt functions as a subtext in Lola rennt, turning Tykwer's film into a pastiche of its illustrious forerunner of 1927. Both films emphatically express – at opposite ends of the twentieth century – those changes in the human perceptive apparatus that Walter Benjamin, in The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, regarded as indicators as well as initiators of socio-historical change. Seen in this context, Lola rennt might be considered a postmodern sequel to the modernist Berlin: Die
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.041 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".