MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057215255 · doi:10.5555/1639809.1639909

Implementation of architectural model for grid resources discovery

2009· article· en· W2057215255 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSpring Simulation Multiconference · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceGrid computingSemantic gridScalabilityGridArchitectureSpace-based architectureDistributed computingMetadataDRMAAApplications architectureResource (disambiguation)Software architectureComputer architectureSoftwareDatabaseOperating systemWorld Wide WebSemantic WebComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a brief introduction of grid computing and services has been discussed. Next, grid simulation software GridSim is explained. The J2EE enterprise application architecture is compared to implement the proposed architecture within NetBeans IDE 6.1. Then the implementation of proposed architecture as J2EE enterprise application is elaborated. The architecture is implemented as enterprise application because it addresses the scalability issues of grid computing. Finally, the simulation results of initial implementation of architecture model for grid resources discovery are given. This model for resource discovery is found more scalable due to use of semantic information such as metadata. The initial results of simulation of grid resource discovery model are compared with GridSim that represents no architecture in our simulation and it is found efficient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it