MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057215260 · doi:10.1159/000270886

Cultural Differences in Color/Form Preference and in Classificatory Behavior

2009· article· en· W2057215260 on OpenAlexaff
Warren H. Schmidt, A. Nzimande

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Development · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicColor perception and design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZuluPreferencePsychologyDevelopmental psychologyHausaSocial psychologyLinguisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents data concerning color-form preference and ability to classify obtained from rural Zulu children with and without Western-type schooling, from literate and illiterate Zulu urban workers, and from illiterate urban workers. Significant differences are shown between children in school and those not going to school, between literate and illiterate urban workers, between illiterate urban and farm workers. Some comparisons are made with Suchman’s [1966a] data on Moslem Hausa children, Gay and Cole’s [1967] data on Kpelle children, Bruner and associates’ [1966] studies of Wolof children, and Corah’s [1964] data on American children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.195
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman DevelopmentSame topicColor perception and designFrench-language works237,207