Cholecystokinin Modulation of Mesolimbic Dopamine Function: Regulation of Motivated Behaviour
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article reviews evidence and presents a hypothesis regarding the effects of stress on motivated behaviour, and in particular the observation that stress can have both motivationally inhibitory and motivationally facilitatory effects. This issue will be addressed with regard to psychostimulant self-administration, and the role that the neurobiological mechanisms underlying motivated behaviour are thought to be involved in the evolution of addictions. Evidence from animal studies shows that stress and stress-related hormones such as corticosterone can facilitate mesolimbic dopamine function and the behavioural effects of psychostimulants, particularly at lower levels of stress. Conversely, higher levels of stress can inhibit motivated behaviour, and evidence is presented that this may occur in part through the effects of the neuropeptide cholecystokinin (CCK), acting through CCK-B receptors in the nucleus accumbens. Individual differences in endogenous CCK and dopamine systems are hypothesized to be important modulators of individual differences in motivated behaviour.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".