MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057270394 · doi:10.1533/saos.2006.0122

Brittle fracture in ships – a lingering problem

2006· article· en· W2057270394 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueShips and Offshore Structures · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFatigue and fracture mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCharpy impact testFracture toughnessFracture (geology)Brittle fractureBrittlenessToughnessEmbrittlementEngineeringForensic engineeringMaterials scienceStructural engineeringGeologyGeotechnical engineeringMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a synthesis of the Transportation Safety Board of Canada's (TSB) report on the brittle fracture of the hull of Lake Carling, and concludes with an overview of the TSB's safety concern on brittle fracture in ships, including ongoing initiatives at the International Maritime Organization. The TSB is an independent agency created to advance transportation safety through the investigation of occurrences in the marine, pipeline, rail and air modes of transportation. The majority of the world's civilian cargo vessels have side shells constructed with steel of unqualified toughness (grade A steel). In 2002 and 2003, respectively, samples of side shell steel from Lake Carling and a sister ship, Ziemia Gornoslaska (ex-Lake Charles), were made available to the TSB. Steel from both vessels had very poor fracture arrest toughness (low Charpy Vee Notch energies) at temperatures near 0°C. The relatively low fracture toughness of the side shell plate of Lake Carling, when exposed to near 0°C temperatures, allowed a pre-existing crack at frame 91 to grow to failure at a load well below the ultimate tensile strength of the material. Given the uncertainties and variability of fracture arrest toughness for some grade A and B steels, it would appear that residual risks for unstable brittle fracture are still present in vessels with hulls constructed with these steels, especially when operating in colder climates. Because there are no International Association of Classification Societies Ltd. Unified Requirements to use steel of qualified toughness in way of a vessel's side shell, the risk of brittle fracture can be perpetuated in a significant proportion of new buildings. Given the gravity of consequences of brittle fracture, the establishment of a standard is desirable. The standard should be rigorous enough to ensure that steel toughness would be adequate under all expected operating conditions such that a reasonable damage tolerance can be predicted and relied upon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.289
Threshold uncertainty score0.778

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it