L’intégration des services et des pratiques. L’épreuve de l’expérience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les auteures explorent comment l'intégration des services se concrétise dans des contextes particuliers en s'appuyant sur une recherche portant sur les discours et les pratiques d'intervenants et des personnes utilisatrices regroupées au sein d'organismes de la communauté. Leur analyse vise à comprendre comment les modèles prévalant au niveau de l'organisation des services se répercutent d'une part, sur les règles qui régissent l'organisation du travail des intervenants et leur conception des problèmes et des interventions ; et d'autre part, sur le climat des organismes et la vie quotidienne des personnes, les rapports entre elles et les intervenants ainsi que sur la place accordée à la parole, aux projets et aux désirs des personnes utilisatrices. Il s'agit ainsi d'examiner comment les modèles organisationnels et leurs implications affectent les possibilités offertes aux personnes utilisatrices et les voies qui s'ouvrent ou non pour améliorer leurs conditions d'existence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".