MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057318825 · doi:10.3917/ep.054.0048

Penser la violence adolescente dans le cadre scolaire

2012· article· fr· W2057318825 on OpenAlexaff
Didier Lauru

Bibliographic record

VenueEnfances & Psy · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsChild, Adolescent and Family Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesConstitutionPolitical sciencePhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé La violence, comme l’agressivité, fait partie de la constitution du sujet. À l’adolescence, avec la reviviscence du sexuel, le sujet en construction apprend à contenir et à canaliser son agressivité, en lien avec la violence du sexuel. La clinique montre que la violence se déchaîne quand la parole fait défaut, mais se déclenche parfois dans la réalité, souvent sur le lieu de vie quotidien : le collège ou le lycée. Comment penser, voire comprendre, cette violence ? Surtout, comment y répondre ? C’est l’enjeu du malaise actuel des adolescents dans la civilisation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.510
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnfances & PsySame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207