Observation of TiH<sub>5</sub> and TiH<sub>7</sub> in Bulk-Phase TiH<sub>3</sub> Gels for Kubas-Type Hydrogen Storage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The lack of an efficient hydrogen storage material has so far hindered the implementation of hydrogen as an energy vector, that is, a substance that allows the transfer through space and time of a certain quantity of energy from its original source. This work presents porous Ti(III) hydride gels as a promising new hydrogen storage material, exploiting the first example of a solid-state homoleptic metal hydride that binds further H 2 ligands using the Kubas interaction. These materials use bridging hydride ligands as an ultralightweight structural feature to support a microporous network of Ti binding sites for molecular H 2 chemisorption. High-pressure Raman spectroscopy confirmed the first evidence of TiH 5 and TiH 7 species, in some ways analogous to hypervalent MH 5 and MH 7 (M = Si, Ge, Sn) species. The material with the highest capacity has an excess reversible storage of 3.49 wt % at 140 bar and 298 K without saturation, corresponding to a volumetric density of 44.3 kg/m 3, comparable to the DOE 2017 volumetric system goal of 40 kgH 2 /m 3 . However, extrapolations show that the phase-pure material is capable of binding at least 6 wt % hydrogen reversibly at room temperature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".