MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057351000 · doi:10.1021/cr800296p

Natural Product Synthesis Using Multicomponent Reaction Strategies

2009· review· en· W2057351000 on OpenAlexaffabout
B. Barry Touré, Dennis G. Hall

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Reviews · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationLibrary scienceSocial mediaComputer scienceProduct (mathematics)World Wide WebInformation retrievalMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVReviewNEXTNatural Product Synthesis Using Multicomponent Reaction StrategiesBarry B. Tour醠and Dennis G. Hall*‡View Author Information Department of Oncology Chemistry, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Inc., 250 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, and Department of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G2, Canada* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]†Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research.‡Department of Chemistry, University of Alberta.Cite this: Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 9, 4439–4486Publication Date (Web):May 29, 2009Publication History Received14 December 2008Published online29 May 2009Published inissue 9 September 2009https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cr800296phttps://doi.org/10.1021/cr800296preview-articleACS PublicationsCopyright © 2009 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views27243Altmetric-Citations1465LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:Aldehydes,Chemical synthesis,Ethers,Organic synthesis,Pharmaceuticals Get e-Alerts

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.132
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1,691
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical ReviewsSame topicSynthetic Organic Chemistry MethodsFrench-language works237,207