MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Determination of α S using OPAL hadronic event shapes at $\sqrt{s} = 91\mbox{--}209~\mathrm{GeV}$ and resummed NNLO calculations

2011· article· en· W2057381510 on OpenAlexaff
G. Abbiendi, C. Ainsley, P.F. Åkesson, G. Alexander, G. Anagnostou, K. J. Anderson, S. Asai, D. Axen, I. Bailey, E. L. Barberio, T. Barillari, R. J. Barlow, R.J. Batley, T. Behnke, K. W. Bell, P. J. Bell, G. Bella, A. Bellerive, G. Benelli, S. Bethke, O. Biebel, O. E. Vickey Boeriu, P. Bock, M. Boutemeur, S. Braibant, R. M. Brown, H. Burckhart, S. Campana, P. Capiluppi, R.K. Carnegie, A. A. Carter, J. R. Carter, C.Y. Chang, D. G. Charlton, C. Ciocca, Á. Csilling, M. Cuffiani, S. Dado, Marco Dallavalle, A. De Roeck, E. A. De Wolf, B. Dienes, J. Dubbert, E. Duchovni, G. Duckeck, I. P. Duerdoth, E. Etzion, F. Fabbri, P. Ferrari, F. Fiedler, I. Fleck, M. Ford, A. Frey, P. Gagnon, J. W. Gary, Ch. Geich-Gimbel, G. Giacomelli, P. Giacomelli, M. Giunta, J. Goldberg, E. Ros, J. Grunhaus, M. Gruwé, A. Gupta, C. Hajdu, M. Hamann, G. G. Hanson, A. Harel, M. Hauschild, C. M. Hawkes, R. J. Hawkings, G. Herten, R.D. Heuer, J. C. Hill, Dezső Horváth, P. Igo-Kemenes, K. Ishii, H. Jérémie, P. Jovanović, T. R. Junk, J. Kanzaki, D. Karlen, K. Kawagoe, T. Kawamoto, R. Keeler, R. G. Kellogg, B. W. Kennedy, S. Kluth, T. Kobayashi, M. Kobel, S. Komamiya, T. Krämer, A. Krasznahorkay, P. Krieger, J. von Krogh, T. Kühl, M. Kupper, G. Lafferty, H. Landsman, D. Lanske, D. Lellouch, J. Letts, L. J. Levinson, J. Lillich, S. L. Lloyd, F. K. Loebinger, J. Lu, A. Ludwig, J. Ludwig, W. Mader, S. Marcellini, A. J. Martin, T. Mashimo, P. Mättig, J. A. McKenna, R. A. McPherson, F. Meijers, W. Menges, F. S. Merritt, H. Mes, N. T. Meyer, A. Michelini, S. Mihara, G. Mikenberg, D.J. Miller, W. Mohr, T. Mori, A. Mutter, K. Nagai, I. Nakamura, H. Nanjo, H. A. Neal, S.W. OʼNeale, A. Oh, M. J. Oreglia, S. Orito, C. Pahl, G. Pásżtor, J. R. Pater, J. E. Pilcher, J. L. Pinfold, D. E. Plane, O. Pooth, M. Przybycień, A. Quadt, K. Rabbertz, C. Rembser, P. Renkel, J. M. Roney, A. Rossi, Y. Rozen, K. Runge, K. Sachs, T. Saeki, E.K.G. Sarkisyan, A.D. Schaile, O. Schaile, P. Scharff-Hansen, J. Schieck, T. Schörner-Sadenius, M. Schröder, M. Schumacher, R. Seuster, T. Shears, B. C. Shen, A. Skuja, Andrew Smith, Randy Sobie, S. Söldner‐Rembold, F. Spanò, A. Stahl, D. M. Strom, R. Ströhmer, S. Tarem, M. Taševský, R. J. Teuscher, M. Thomson, E. Torrence, D. Toya, I. M. Trigger, Z. L. Trocsanyi, E. Tsur, M. F. Watson, I. Ueda, B. Ujvári, C.F. Vollmer, P. Vannerem, Róbert Vértesi, M. Verzocchi, H. Voss, J. H. Vossebeld, C. P. Ward, D. R. Ward, P. M. Watkins, A. T. Watson, N. K. Watson, P. S. Wells, T. Wengler, N. Wermes, G. Wilson, T. R. Wyatt, Shinji Yamashita, D. Zer-Zion, L. Živković

Bibliographic record

VenueThe European Physical Journal C · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoTRIUMFCarleton UniversityUniversity of AlbertaUniversité de MontréalUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of British Columbia
FundersHigh Energy PhysicsScience and Technology Facilities CouncilHungarian Scientific Research FundBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAnnihilationParticle physicsQuantum chromodynamicsHadronRenormalizationElectron–positron annihilationAsymptotic freedomOrder (exchange)Nuclear physicsMathematical physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hadronic event shape distributions from e + e -annihilation measured by the OPAL experiment at centre-ofmass energies between 91 GeV and 209 GeV are used to determine the strong coupling S . The results are based on QCD predictions complete to the next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO), and on NNLO calculations matched to the resummed next-to-leading-log-approximation terms (NNLO+ NLLA). The combined NNLO result from all variables and centre-of-mass energies is S (m Z 0 ) = 0.1201 0.0008(stat.) 0.0013(exp.) 0.0010(had.) 0.0024(theo.) while the combined NNLO + NLLA result is S (m Z 0 ) = 0.1189 0.0008(stat.) 0.0016(exp.) 0.0010(had.) 0.0036(theo.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.508
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe European Physical Journal CSame topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207