Suicide des jeunes et homophobie en France : présentation d’une enquête et d’actions de prévention
Bibliographic record
Abstract
De nombreuses recherches ont mis en évidence un lien significatif entre orientation sexuelle et suicide des adolescent-e-s / jeunes adultes (Beck et al., 2010). L’homophobie à laquelle les jeunes homo/bisexuel-le-s sont exposé-e-s est considérée comme l’hypothèse la plus sérieuse pour expliquer ce lien, mais, jusqu’ici, cette hypothèse n’avait jamais fait l’objet d’une recherche quantitative en France. Nous l’avons prise en compte dans le cadre d’une enquête réalisée sur la base d’un questionnaire informatisé auto-administré auquel ont répondu 475 filles et 426 garçons, âgé-e-s de 18 à 24 ans. Les résultats confirment la sursuicidalité des jeunes homo/bisexuelle-le-s et mettent en évidence l’impact de l’intimidation homophobe en milieu scolaire chez les adolescents et jeunes adultes de sexe masculin. Ce constat nous amène à évoquer le travail de prévention mené par les associations, notamment l’aide aux familles et les interventions en milieu scolaire proposées par l’association Contact.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".