MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057415767 · doi:10.1097/pcc.0b013e31818d1971

Predicting major adverse events after cardiac surgery in children

2008· article· en· W2057415767 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Seear, Jennifer C. Scarfe, Jacques G. LeBlanc

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Critical Care Medicine · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsChildren's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiac surgeryAdverse effectObservational studyIntensive care unitMean arterial pressureBlood pressureCardiologyCentral venous pressureCardiac outputExtracorporeal circulationInternal medicineProspective cohort studyIntensive careNeonatal intensive care unitCardiopulmonary bypassHeart rateIntensive care medicinePediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To develop a reliable predictor of major adverse events after pediatric cardiac surgery, with the aim of reducing mortality of cardiac extracorporeal life support through earlier, more accurate patient selection. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Tertiary level pediatric intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Fifty-two children undergoing open heart surgery considered above-average risk based on preoperative assessment. INTERVENTIONS: None; strictly observational study. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A wide range of measurements was made at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 hrs after surgery, including: oxygen consumption, central venous pressure and oxygen saturation (Scvo2), cardiac output (Fick), heart rate, arterial pressure, arterial lactate, urine output, core-toe temperature gradient, and derived hemodynamic variables. Six children had major adverse events; three needed extracorporeal life support, two died. There were no correlations between routine postoperative measurements (blood pressure, pulse, temperature gradient, central venous pressure) and any measure of cardiac function, and neither group of variables predicted adverse outcomes. Lactate (>8 mmol/L) and Scvo2 (<40%) had high sensitivity (both 73.7%) and specificity (96.3% and 95.4%, respectively), for predicting major adverse event but positive predictive values for both were low (63.6% and 58.3%, respectively). The ratio of the two had better predictive power than the individual values. When the ratio (Scvo2, %)/(lactate, mmol/L) fell below 5, the positive predictive value for major adverse event was 93.8% (sensitivity 78.9%, specificity 90.5%). The effect was present at all postoperative time points. CONCLUSIONS: Lactate and Scvo2 are the only postoperative measurements with predictive power for major adverse events. Forming a ratio of the two (Scvo2/lactate), seems to improve predictive power, presumably by combining their individual predictive strengths. Both measures have excellent specificities but lower sensitivities. Predictive power of single measures is only fair but can be improved, in high risk patients, by monitoring repeated measures over time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.960

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Critical Care MedicineSame topicSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207