Daily methylphenidate administration attenuates c-fos expression in the striatum of prepubertal rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Methylphenidate (Ritalin) is a psychostimulant drug used to treat children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Despite its widespread and increasing clinical use, little is known about the long-term consequences of drug treatment. We compared the effects of a single injection of methylphenidate with that of long-term methylphenidate injections (one/day; 14 days) on immediate-early gene expression (c-fos) in the striatum of prepubertal male rats. Rats (25 days old) were injected once daily for 14 days with either saline or methylphenidate (1, 2 or 10 mg/kg), or for 13 days with saline followed by one injection of methylphenidate (1, 2 or 10 mg/kg) on day 14, and were sacrificed 2 h post-injection. Methylphenidate dose-dependently increased FOS immunoreactivity in the striatum. A single injection of methylphenidate (2 or 10 mg/kg) on day 14, following saline treatment for 13 days, caused a dramatic elevation in c-fos expression. This effect was significantly attenuated in animals treated chronically with methylphenidate (2 or 10 mg/kg) for the entire 14 days. Our data suggest that repeated methylphenidate treatment, at a clinically relevant dose (2 mg/kg), markedly inhibits immediate-early gene expression in the brain. This is the first demonstration of methylphenidate-induced modification of gene expression in developing rat striatum and may have implications for chronic methylphenidate use in children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".