MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057449365 · doi:10.5539/mas.v4n3p28

Positioning Control of Unmanned-plane based on Regional Feature Matching

2010· article· en· W2057449365 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jianghong Li, Liang Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSalientComputer scienceMatching (statistics)Artificial intelligenceFeature (linguistics)Feature matchingComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)Invariant (physics)Code (set theory)Image matchingTransformation (genetics)Feature extractionImage (mathematics)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Positioning control of UAV is one of the research areas of autonomous navigation. Regional feature matching algorithm is commonly used in the positioning control of UAVs. This paper proposes a regional feature matching algorithm, in which edges and gray-levels within image regions are extracted. The correspondences between regional features are then obtained in terms of invariant moments and chain-code representation of regions. The transformation parameters are estimated based on the centers of gravity of regions. Experimental results show the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm using salient regional features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.368

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207