MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057451871 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.115446

Towards a rigorous proof of magnetism on the edges of graphene nanoribbons

2012· article· en· W2057451871 on OpenAlexaff
Hamed Karimi, Ian Affleck

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphene research and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZigzagCondensed matter physicsGapless playbackMagnetismHubbard modelPhysicsPhase diagramMagnetic momentGrapheneSpin (aerodynamics)Ground stateFerromagnetismMoment (physics)Quantum mechanicsPhase (matter)SuperconductivityMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A zigzag edge of a graphene nanoribbon supports localized zero modes, ignoring interactions. Based mainly on mean field arguments and numerical approaches, it has been suggested that interactions can produce a large magnetic moment on the edges. By considering the Hubbard model in the weak coupling limit, $U\ensuremath{\ll}t$, for bearded as well as zigzag edges, we argue for such a magnetic state, based on Lieb's theorem. Projecting the Hubbard interactions onto the flat edge band, we then prove that the resulting one-dimensional model has a fully polarized ferromagnetic ground state. We also study excitons and the effects of second neighbor hopping as well as a potential energy term acting on the edge only, proposing a simple and possibly exact phase diagram with the magnetic moment varying smoothly to zero. Finally, we consider corrections of second order in $U$, arising from integrating out the gapless bulk Dirac excitations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.422
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicGraphene research and applicationsFrench-language works237,207