A Five-Factor Model Description of Depressive Personality Disorder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This investigation extends previous work on Five-Factor Model (FFM) personality disorder profiles. Specifically, a FFM expert consensus prototype for Depressive Personality Disorder (DPD) using the 30 facets of the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO PI-R) was developed. Initial validation of this prototype in a psychiatric population employed several clinical scales. When combined with trait information yielded by criteria translation and empirical approaches, the composite FFM profile emphasized several facets that represent the core components of DPD. In addition to several traits represented by the current DSM conceptualization of DPD, such as depressiveness, anxiousness, self-consciousness, and low tendermindedness, the composite profile was also characterized by several unrepresented traits, such as high modesty and low positive emotionality, warmth, assertiveness, trust, and achievement striving. Future definitions of depressive personality, conceptualized either as a DSM-V personality disorder or as a multifaceted construct, should consider these additional traits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".